Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Have Similar Safety Profiles in Melanoma

Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody therapies nivolumab and pembrolizumab are associated with improved treatment outcomes in melanoma.

Survival outcomes and response rates to nivolumab or pembrolizumab are similar among patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma who are treatment-naive, according to study findings published in Melanoma Research.

Researchers evaluated safety outcomes in patients (N=1037) with inoperable or metastatic melanoma who received first-line treatment with nivolumab (n=582) or pembrolizumab (n=455) between 2016 and 2020.

The nivolumab and pembrolizumab recipients were median ages 67 (range, 21-93) and 67 (range, 18-92) years, 57% and 59% were men, 88% and 88% had primary tumor of the skin, 22% and 22% had a B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) mutation, and 18% and 22% had brain metastasis, respectively.

After a median follow-up of 16 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 17.4 months for pembrolizumab and 20.0 months for nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28; P =.2323) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 and 7.5 months (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.98-1.29; P =.0941), respectively.

The choice of treatment with a nivolumab or pembrolizumab should be based on the preferences of the patient and the clinician, as well as regional resources or pandemic restrictions.

Similarly, no group differences were observed for OS at 2 (42%-47%) and 3 (34%-37%) years or PFS at 2 (25%-29%) or 3 (21%-23%) years.

Among the pembrolizumab recipients, predictors for OS included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0 (HR, 0.26; P <.0001), normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (HR, 0.58; P <.0001), and no brain metastasis (HR, 0.7; P =.0088). Predictors for PFS included ECOG score of 0 (HR, 0.54; P =.0263) and normal LDH levels (HR, 0.57; P <.0001).

For nivolumab, OS was related with ECOG score of 0 (HR, 0.26; P <.0001), normal LDH levels (HR, 0.58; P <.0001), and no brain metastasis (HR, 0.7; P =.0088). Nivolumab’s PFS was associated with normal LDH levels (HR, 0.69; P =.0002), ECOG score of 0 (HR, 0.69; P =.0004), and no brain metastasis (HR, 0.73; P =.0110).

The rates of immune-related adverse events were 42% among pembrolizumab recipients and 53% among nivolumab recipients. The most common events in the pembrolizumab cohort were vitiligo (12%), hypothyroidism (9%), hepatitis or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (6%), and dermatitis or pruritis (6%). In the nivolumab group, the most common events included hepatitis or AST or ALT elevation (12%), hypothyroidism (8%), hyperthyroidism (5%), and diarrhea or colitis (4%).

The major limitation of this analysis is the retrospective study design.

The study authors conclude, “The choice of treatment with a nivolumab or pembrolizumab should be based on the preferences of the patient and the clinician, as well as regional resources or pandemic restrictions.”

Disclosures: Some study authors declared affiliations with biotech, pharmaceutical, and/or device companies. Please see the original reference for a full list of disclosures.

References:

Cybulska-Stopa B, Piejko K, Ostaszewski K, et al. Long-term clinical evidence of comparable efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma treatment. Melanoma Res. Published online April 3, 2023. doi:10.1097/CMR.0000000000000885