Eosinophilic spongiosis, vacuolar interface dermatitis, dermal eosinophilia, mucosal involvement, psoriasis history, and the presence of scaling plaques can help differentiate acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and pustular psoriasis, study findings published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology suggest.
A total of 22 cases of AGEP and 11 cases of pustular psoriasis were identified from the laboratory information system at the dermatology department of the University of Florida in Gainesville. Clinical and histopathologic features of each case were reviewed to identify features that could reliably distinguish AGEP from pustular psoriasis. In addition, the researchers performed an immunohistochemistry panel consisting of PHH3, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD161, and FOXP3.
Histopathologic findings that were most common for AGEP vs pustular psoriasis were eosinophilic spongiosis (P =.018), vacuolar interface dermatitis (P =.010), and dermal eosinophilia (P =.003). Conversely, pustular psoriasis was favored by dermal CD161 positivity with a threshold of 10 positive cells per punch biopsy vs AGEP (P <.001). The researchers did not find FOXP3 helpful in distinguishing between the 2 disorders. Mucosal involvement was a clinical feature that was unique to AGEP despite its lack of significance. Clinical features that distinguished pustular psoriasis from AGEP included psoriasis history (P <.001) and the presence of scaling plaques (P =.005).
Study limitations included the small sample size, as well as the inclusion of retrospective laboratory data from a single center.
Findings from this study indicate that “a combination of clinical and histopathologic findings is helpful in differentiating AGEP from [pustular psoriasis],” the researchers concluded.
Reference
Isom J, Braswell DS, Siroy A, Auerbach J, Motaparthi K. Clinical and histopathologic features differentiating acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and pustular psoriasis: a retrospective series [published online March 12, 2020]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.015